Sir Jim Ratcliffe is looking to build a new stadium for Manchester United; the British billionaire wants to build a 'Wembley of the North'; the Old Trafford Regeneration Task Force has revealed images of what a new stadium could look like
Monday 23 September 2024 19:47, UK
Are Manchester United getting a new stadium? What will it mean for the future of Old Trafford? And how much will this all cost? Sky Sports takes a look at the key questions...
The Daily Telegraph reported in February that Sir Jim Ratcliffe wants to create a new stadium for United, who have spent the last 114 years at Old Trafford, which holds nearly 74,000 spectators.
The plan, according to the report, would see United create a 'Wembley of the North' to rival the 90,000-seater national stadium in north London.
Now the Old Trafford Regeneration Task Force - which Ratcliffe chairs - has backed up that viewpoint, throwing its weight behind the idea of a new stadium which could reportedly hold up to 100,000. That would make it the largest in the UK.
It is still early days and premature to suggest that this is the only direction United will take, though it is the favoured route to create a new world-class venue with surrounding benefits.
Other members in the task force include Lord Coe, Sky Sports pundit and former United defender Gary Neville, and Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham.
"I was told that Sir Jim Ratcliffe turned up for one of his meetings and he had the feeling that for arguably the biggest football club in the world, the wow factor just wasn't there," said United We Stand Editor Andy Mitten to Sky Sports News in February. "I agree with that."
In September the first images of United's Old Trafford regeneration plans were revealed.
Burnham insisted that United are not seeking public money to fund the regeneration of the stadium.
Burnham told Sky News: "[Fans] can expect one of, if not the best, stadiums in the world."
Sky Sports' Gary Neville:
"There are two different things happening. Manchester United will build a new stadium and for that there should be no public money. That's absolutely clear.
"Andy Burnham has said that before and I'm absolutely unequivocal on that. With the amount of stress that's in the public finance at this moment in time, it's unjustifiable that it can go into a football club.
"However, you think of what's happened with HS2 now being cut to the north of England, and the devastation that will cause and the damage that will cause to the northern region.
"When you talk about 'Northern Powerhouse' as a 'levelling up' - the previous government's motto - none of that has ever happened. It's just words. It's PR slogan.
"What this will do is redistribute the freight into a different part of the north west to allow capacity to open up in Greater Manchester, in Liverpool, and other parts and beyond, which will have a massive impact on the economy locally.
"You try and get on a train at Manchester to London, or you try and get on trains around Manchester and around Liverpool, it's tough. We need upgrades in our public transport and that's what's happening here.
"We're talking about an opportunity that could regenerate the area in Trafford, in Greater Manchester but also correct what would be a struggling transport network in the north of England.
"So it's a win-win all around. I want to be really clear. We're going to finish with the line. There is no public money that is going into a football stadium."
A report has found the project to deliver the new stadium could generate an additional £7.3bn each year to the UK economy.
According to Oxford Economics, one of the world's leading independent global advisory firms, initial assessments of the project could see 92,000 jobs and 17,000 homes created, as well as bringing in around 1.8m more visitors each year.
Sky Sports News understands that the club are not seeking public money for the stadium, which has been reiterated by Burnham and Neville at the Labour Party Conference on Monday, but there could be opportunities for public-private partnership.
The model pictured at the conference is not indicative of a potential design but is instead illustrations of where the new stadium would be positioned.
According to the Telegraph's original report, Ratcliffe is against the idea of relocating the club, but feels supporters will be behind a stadium move if they stay within the same land.
United own around 100 acres of land around Old Trafford and 43 acres of that land is ripe for development. Around 25 acres are said to be unused and the club feel it is under-utilised.
Now the task force has concluded it could be best used to build an entirely new stadium, rather than renovating the existing ground.
United have already been researching what other sports clubs have done around the world, including the SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles, the venue in which they suffered pre-season defeat to Arsenal.
The club held several meetings with the team behind that development, which is privately-funded, in the lead up to their USA tour to learn from the project.
As part of the Future of Football series, Jim Heverin, a director at Zaha Hadid Architects, said the manner in which Barcelona, Real Madrid and Liverpool have renovated their own stadia, rather than building new ones, is the template United should follow.
"At Old Trafford, you'd definitely expect them to be thinking about repurposing and not going anywhere else. Look at what Liverpool has been doing with these small modifications and upgrades. That looks like the future and not brand new stadiums," he said.
"I know why Everton are moving but that is looking more like the old way of looking at new stadiums, particularly when you have something already that is an asset."
Sky Sports' Neville, part of the Old Trafford Regeneration Task Force, has been very vocal about the need to improve the Old Trafford facilities. "Maybe what Liverpool have done is the way forward," he said late last year.
"If there is a shortage of funds, maybe get one or two stands, absolutely world class, and the other two follow up over the next five to 10 years. That would be a plan."
Oh, quite a lot. "Old Trafford is falling down" is the first line of a chant that fans of rival clubs have continually used to point fun at United.
The falling standards of United's ground have been well-documented, the latest example coming in the wake of their home defeat to Arsenal in May, where areas of the stadium flooded following a thunderstorm, with water also falling through the roof.
Other videos of run-down parts of the ground have circulated online in recent years and even though it is the largest club stadium in England, it was not selected to be one of the host venues for Euro 2028 in the UK and Ireland.
"The main stand does need doing, so does the roof, but the exterior of the stadium needs doing too," added Mitten. "It looks a little bit red in different areas and there are fundamental issues with Old Trafford which are not great. The legroom is notorious in the stadium.
"The designs of stadiums have changed since they first designed stadiums and the legroom is still the same now.
"It's a beautiful stadium, Old Trafford - but I'm not a fan of the roof because I think it comes in too low. Old Trafford shouldn't be getting smaller, it should be getting bigger."
Neville has been very vocal about the need to improve the Old Trafford facilities. "I've heard that there is only a couple of hundred million of pounds or so being spent on Old Trafford. That's nowhere near enough," he said late last year.
"I'd rather have £200m spent on the old stadium and have two parts of Old Trafford looking absolutely amazing. It's important that you have pride in where you play and Old Trafford is an amazing stadium."
The last time the club undertook major works on Old Trafford was in May 2006, when 8,000 seats were added to the north-west and north-east quadrants of the stadium.
That work was approved before the Glazer family took control of the club in June 2005, meaning no work has been done to renovate Old Trafford since United's majority shareholders took over 19 years ago.
Mitten believes the Manchester United fans are divided on how they want Old Trafford to be redeveloped, but adds that money and costs will come into the equation.
"From what I can see Manchester United fans are split on the decision of redeveloping or building a new stadium," he said.
"I've been lucky enough to see some stadium developments around Europe, such as Marseille. I've always favoured a redevelopment but I'm open to hearing and so are other fans. If the redevelopment ends up costing more money than a new stadium then that shifts the debate into a different area.
"Some fans love the idea of a new stadium. I love what Real Madrid have done and what Barcelona are doing, but I'm not completely against the idea of building a new stadium.
"I just favour a redevelopment. For me, Old Trafford just needs to be expanded. Old Trafford is a brilliant stadium but it's not the best stadium in the world."
Staying on the same land is a move Tottenham made when they developed their new stadium. Spurs left their old White Hart Lane ground in 2016, spent nearly three seasons at Wembley, before moving back into their new 61,000-seater venue in early 2019.
One issue is that Old Trafford is located between a railway line and a canal, making the logistics relatively challenging. While Brentford managed to overcome a similar challenge for their Gtech Community Stadium in 2020, their stadium is much smaller, holding just 17,000 fans.
The renovation of the Aviva Stadium in Dublin's Lansdowne Road also saw railway-line-related challenges, with a line running alongside the west of the stadium. That renovation was completed in 2010.
The Telegraph reported that expanding Old Trafford would cost United around £800m, whereas a new ground would cost around £1.5bn to £2bn.
Tottenham's new stadium cost the club around £1.2bn, according to Spurs owner Daniel Levy in an interview in November 2020.
As part of his £1.2bn deal to buy a stake in United, Ratcliffe is putting £239m into the club to help boost the club's infrastructure. Qatari banker Sheikh Jassim, who rivalled Ratcliffe in the running to control United, was willing to pledge £1.27bn for the same work.
Financing has been one of the key considerations of the task force and a wide variety of potential private funding sources will be explored. There could be opportunities for a public-private partnership to power the regeneration of the area.
However, Burnham revealed in September that United are not seeking public money to fund the regeneration of the stadium.
"Whatever it is they [Ratcliffe and INEOS] want, we will facilitate and we will be there to make sure the club is set up for the future," he said.
